<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AdWords Impression Share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/</link>
	<description>News and Views on SEO, SEM, and Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/comment-page-1/#comment-37225</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/#comment-37225</guid>
		<description>Hi John. Having a low Impression Share due to rank means that your bids aren&#039;t high enough relative to others&#039; bids for the ads to show all the time. This is not a function of ad quality (7 is good). If you look at the average ad position over that time, it&#039;s probably well above 1. If there only a few competing advertisers, your loss due to rank will likely correspond to an ad position of 5 to 7. However, if there are a lot of advertisers on those keywords, you can lose a lot impressions even with a &quot;good&quot; ad position of 3 to 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John. Having a low Impression Share due to rank means that your bids aren&#8217;t high enough relative to others&#8217; bids for the ads to show all the time. This is not a function of ad quality (7 is good). If you look at the average ad position over that time, it&#8217;s probably well above 1. If there only a few competing advertisers, your loss due to rank will likely correspond to an ad position of 5 to 7. However, if there are a lot of advertisers on those keywords, you can lose a lot impressions even with a &#8220;good&#8221; ad position of 3 to 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/comment-page-1/#comment-37223</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adwords-impression-share/#comment-37223</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just run a month long campaign on selected keywords with a max CPC of $0.50 ( actual was $0.38) and a good budget.There was never a time when the campaign was off because of budget restrictions. I obtained a lot of impressions and good CTR (&gt;4%) but when I ran the campaign report I was shocked to see I&#039;d missed out on 68% of impressions due to &quot;rank&quot;. The average Quality Score was 7, so what do I need to do to get more of the missed impressions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just run a month long campaign on selected keywords with a max CPC of $0.50 ( actual was $0.38) and a good budget.There was never a time when the campaign was off because of budget restrictions. I obtained a lot of impressions and good CTR (&gt;4%) but when I ran the campaign report I was shocked to see I&#8217;d missed out on 68% of impressions due to &#8220;rank&#8221;. The average Quality Score was 7, so what do I need to do to get more of the missed impressions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

