<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Marketing Blog &#187; Usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/tag/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog</link>
	<description>News and Views on SEO, SEM, and Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More reasons to avoid Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/more-reasons-to-avoid-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/more-reasons-to-avoid-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the years we&#8217;ve lamented the online popularity and over-reliance on Flash because of concerns relating to usability, navigability, indexability, measurability, portability, and so on. Now Steve Jobs has provided a litany of additional reasons that Flash is not supported by Apple products including the iPad, iPod, and iPhone. While some of our concerns make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/more-reasons-to-avoid-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google browser size and visibility tool</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/google-browser-size-and-visibility-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/google-browser-size-and-visibility-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/?p=680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Labs just rolled out a browser size tool to help you see how your website is seen by people with different screen sizes (more literally, browser winder sizes). This tool can tell you if an important elements of you page is showing up &#8220;above the fold&#8221; or if it remains hidden unless users scroll. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/google-browser-size-and-visibility-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe + Omniture, why?</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adobe-omniture-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adobe-omniture-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe is buying Omniture, a leading provider of web analytics and analysis provider.What does this mean for online marketers and our clients? This struck me as an odd combination until I started digging a little further into recent history of these companies and the direction of application development. Adobe makes software such as Acrobat, Dreamweaver, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/adobe-omniture-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High bounce rates aren&#8217;t always bad</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/high-bounce-rates-arent-always-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/high-bounce-rates-arent-always-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landing Pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bounce rates are commonly used as KPIs for all kinds of websites since they show the &#8220;stickiness&#8221; of a site for new visitors. If people leave the site right away (high bounce rate), either the landing page is under-performing, or the wrong kinds of visitors are going there. However, having a low bounce rate may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/high-bounce-rates-arent-always-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>800&#215;600 is dead, almost</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/800x600-is-dead-almost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/800x600-is-dead-almost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were just revisiting an old client&#8217;s site, and we were struck by how narrow the design looks, having been designed to fit on 800 pixel screen widths. (My MacBook Pro&#8217;s &#8220;squat&#8221; 1440&#215;900 screen definitely exaggerates this effect.) It used to be considered a best practice to design websites for 800&#215;600 pixel displays. This width [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/800x600-is-dead-almost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The number 1 design rule</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/the-number-1-design-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/the-number-1-design-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/the-number-1-design-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The golden rule for good web design is simply: Don&#8217;t annoy users. They will leave. A lot of big, beautiful, and expensive web sites commit cardinal sins that result in higher bounce rates and lower sales. Most annoying behaviors are easy to avoid. These sins include: Splash pages Sound or music when the page loads [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/the-number-1-design-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 free SEO tips</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/10-free-seo-tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/10-free-seo-tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On-Page Factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keyword Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/10-free-seo-tips/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to do SEO yourself? Or do you want to save time and money working with SEO consultants like us? Here are some free SEO tips to get your started: Write more &#8212; You can&#8217;t have too much content. Not only will it help with your most important keywords, it will also help acquire traffic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/10-free-seo-tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with no-www</title>
		<link>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/whats-wrong-with-no-www/</link>
		<comments>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/whats-wrong-with-no-www/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[301 Redirects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redirects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/whats-wrong-with-no-www/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a rising debate regarding the use or omission of &#8220;www&#8221; for website addresses. For instance, should a company use &#8220;http://widgets.com&#8221; or &#8220;http://www.widgets.com&#8221;? The debate is debate is getting somewhat heated in some venues, and there is even an organization advocating the omission of &#8220;www&#8221;. We have a problem with this. We don&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.web1marketing.com/blog/index.php/archives/whats-wrong-with-no-www/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

